Cases 1 - 7 of 7
James et al v. Sharp Electronics Corporation
as 2:2019cv03246
Plaintiff:
Jill Wittman and Nancy James
Defendant:
Sharp Electronics Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv02896
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Miscellaneou:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615
Jou v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
as 2:2007cv11529
Plaintiff:
Ling-Hung Jou
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America, CHI MEI Optoelectronics Company, Limited and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Davis v. LG Philips LCD Company LTD et al
as 3:2007cv00282
Plaintiff:
Kathleen C. Davis, Kathleen C. Davis, Kathleen C. Davis and others
Defendant:
LG Philips LCD Company LTD, LG Philips LCD America, Inc., LG Electronics Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Dahm v. LG Philips LCD Company, Limited et al
as 2:2007cv10971
Plaintiff:
Colette M. Dahm
Defendant:
LG Philips LCD Company, Limited, LG Philips LCD America, Incorporated, LG Electronics Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Beall v. Au Optronics Corp. et al
as 2:2007cv02165
Plaintiff:
Scott Beall
Defendant:
Au Optronics Corp., Au Optronics Corp. America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
Griffith v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
as 2:2007cv10613
Plaintiff:
Judith Griffith
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America, CHI MEI Optoelectronics Company, Limited and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
