Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Dustin Young v. John Swaney, et al
as 24-3394
Petitioner: DUSTIN YOUNG
Respondent: JOHN R. SWANEY, Madison County Sheriff and BUTLER COUNTY, OH COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
Anthony Stokes v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 24-5034
Petitioner: ANTHONY DARNELL STOKES
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General, GARY SWANEY, Warden, FCI Manchester and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Tyrone Price v. Gary Swaney, et al
as 23-6114
Plaintiff: TYRONE PRICE
Defendant: G. SWANEY, Warden of F.C.I. Manchester, JOHN DOE, Being Sued as Manager of F.C.I. Manchester, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Williams v. Swaney We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2023cv00214
Petitioner: Steven Williams, Jr.
Respondent: G. Swaney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Salas v. Swaney
as 6:2023cv00205
Petitioner: Juan A. Salas
Respondent: Warden Swaney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Stokes v. Garland et al
as 6:2023cv00206
Petitioner: Anthony Darnell Stokes
Respondent: Merrick B. Garland, Gary Swaney and United States Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lewis v. Swaney
as 6:2023cv00190
Petitioner: Damon S. Lewis and Damon Steven Lewis
Respondent: G. Swaney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Price v. Swaney et al
as 6:2023cv00171
Plaintiff: Tyrone Price
Defendant: G. Swaney, John Doe and USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Swaney
as 6:2023cv00153
Petitioner: Damon S. Lewis and D-Bo
Respondent: G. Swaney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Swaney v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01691
Plaintiff: Tamara Swaney
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?