Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Powerhouse Marks, LLC et al v. Powerhouse Fitness Training, Inc.
as 2:2024cv10021
Plaintiff:
Powerhouse Marks, LLC and Powerhouse Licensing, LLC
Defendant:
Powerhouse Fitness Training, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
NDTI, Inc. et al v. National Driver Training School, Inc.
as 1:2023cv01506
Plaintiff:
NDTI, Inc. doing business as National Driver Training and National Driver Training, Inc. doing business as National Driver Training
Counter Claimant:
National Driver Training School, Inc.
Defendant:
National Driver Training School of Canton, Inc.
Counter Defendant:
NDTI, Inc. and National Driver Training, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
League of Independent Fitness, et al v. Gretchen Whitmer, et al
as 20-1581
Plaintiff / Appellee:
RMP FITNESS, INC., FUSION FITNESS 24/7, LLC, MH & AB, LLC and others
Defendant / Appellant:
ROBERT GORDON, GOVERNOR GRETCHEN WHITMER and ROBERT GORDON, Director, MI Department of Health and Human Services
Hite v. JKM Training, Inc.
as 7:2018cv00012
Plaintiff:
Anthony Hite
Defendant:
JKM Training, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv14326
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
TTI Global Welfare Benefit Plan et al v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan
as 2:2015cv11357
Plaintiff:
TTI Global Welfare Benefit Plan , Technical Training, Inc. and TTI Global
Defendant:
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02386
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
