Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Massage Green International Franchise Corp. v. Ladyne Bunsey, et al
as 24-1007
Petitioner:
MASSAGE GREEN INTERNATIONAL FRANCHISE CORP.
Respondent:
LADYNE BUNSEY, CHRISTOPHER BUNSEY and MG ROCKY RIVER, INC.
Massage Green International Franchise Corp. v Bunsey
as 2:2022mc51267
Petitioner:
Massage Green International Franchise Corp.
Respondent:
Ladyne Bunsey, Christopher Bunsey and MG Rocky River, Inc.
Massage Green International Franchise Corp. v. Gonzalez et al
as 4:2021cv10504
Defendant:
MGS Franchises, LLC, AGR Franchises, LLC and Reinol Gonzalez
Plaintiff:
Massage Green International Franchise Corp.
Cause Of Action: 27 U.S.C. § 185
Massage Green International Franchise Corp. v. Gonzalez
as 2:2019cv11916
Plaintiff:
Massage Green International Franchise Corp.
Defendant:
Reinol Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Massage Green International Franchise Corp. v. Marshall et al
as 2:2019cv11004
Defendant:
Grayson Marshall, Graydar Properties, LLC and Darlene Marshall
Plaintiff:
Massage Green International Franchise Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stanley et al v. Nutrimost Doctors LLC et al
as 2:2018cv12503
Plaintiff:
Ideal You, Inc. and Shane Stanley
Defendant:
Nutrimost LLC, Nutrimost Doctors LLC and Massage Green International Franchise Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-1551
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Kim v. Advanced Fresh Concepts Franchise Corp.
as 3:2016cv00139
Plaintiff:
Mina Kim
Defendant:
Advanced Fresh Concepts Franchise Corp.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv13040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Kahala Franchise Corp v. SCT Tylersville, Inc et al
as 1:2010cv00244
Plaintiff:
Kahala Franchise Corp
Defendant:
SCT Tylersville, Inc, Ray Gammouh and Jerry Teague
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
