Cases 1 - 10 of 12
John Doe, et al v. Dana Nessel, et al
as 23-2097
Plaintiff:
TIM BROWN, JOHN DOE and TIMOTHY RONALD BROWN
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL DANA NESSEL, ANICA LETICA, ONE COURT OF JUSTICE, Judges and others
Mills v. Wallace
as 3:2023cv02284
Petitioner:
Shad D. Mills
Respondent:
Warden Thomas Wallace
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ranes v. Wattson
as 3:2023cv02112
Petitioner:
David Ranes
Respondent:
Warden Thomas Wattson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dwayne Davis v. Thomas Mackie, et al
as 23-1350
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DWAYNE DAVIS, named as Dwayne Davis El
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN THOMAS P. MACKIE, A. HASKEY, GRIEVANCE COORDINATOR T. BASSETT and others
Palmer v. Watson
as 4:2022cv01958
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Palmer
Respondent:
Warden Thomas Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dowdy v. Foley
as 1:2021cv01933
Petitioner:
Shawn E. Dowdy and Shaun E. Dowdy
Respondent:
Warden Thomas Foley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tubbs v. Attorney General of the State of Ohio
as 4:2021cv00925
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Ohio and Warden Thomas Schweitzer
Petitioner:
Jermaine Tubbs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Douglas Jackson v. Berean, et al
as 20-1296
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DOUGLAS CORNELL JACKSON
Defendant / Appellee:
DIRECTOR OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, DEPUTY WARDEN THOMAS, PRISON GUARD M. BROWN and others
Douglas Jackson v. Berean, et al
as 19-1583
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DOUGLAS CORNELL JACKSON
Defendant / Appellee:
DIRECTOR OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, DEPUTY WARDEN THOMAS, QUARTERMASTER J. HENSLEY and others
Sales v. Bowen et al
as 4:2019cv00336
Defendant:
Assistant Warden Thomas Horten, Lt. Bright and Warden Richard Bowen
Plaintiff:
Ryan Sales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
