Cases 1 - 7 of 7
White et al v. Rite Aid Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv01239
Plaintiff:
Andrew White, Mark Rosenberg, United States of America and others
Defendant:
Rite Aid Corporation, Rite Aid of Alabama, Inc., Rite Aid of Connecticut, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Miller v. United States of America et al.
as 2:2022cv03237
Plaintiff:
Mendi L Miller
Defendant:
united states of america c/o office of attorney general, United States Attorney For The Southern District Of Ohio, united states postal service washington d.c. headquarters and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Smoot Construction of Washington, D.C. v. The Smoot Corporation et al
as 2:2022cv01707
Counter Defendant:
Smoot Construction of Washington, D.C.
Counter Claimant:
The Smoot Corporation and Smoot Construction Company of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Board of Education of Boardman Local Schools et al v. Mckinsey & Company, Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv02346
Plaintiff:
Board of Education of Boardman Local Schools and Board of Education of Liberty Local Schools
Defendant:
McKinsey & Company, Inc., McKinsey Holdings, Inc., McKinsey & Company, Inc. United States and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lane v. United States et al
as 1:2015cv00149
Plaintiff:
Anthony P. Lane
Defendant:
United States, Barack Obama, Michelle Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pace et al v. Union Savings Bank et al
as 2:2013cv00643
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn C. Pace and Gabriel C. Pace
Defendant:
Union Savings Bank, Flagstar Bank, FSB, Newbury Place REO II, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Himmelreich v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2010cv02404
Plaintiff:
Walter J Himmelreich
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Peter B. Macari, Roger Oberkramer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
