Cases 51 - 60 of 544,704
Mohamed v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv11195
Plaintiff:
Sadek Abdulhamid Mohamed
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Carpenter v. King et al
as 1:2024cv00465
Petitioner:
Carli Carpenter
Respondent:
Chris King, Kym Worthy, Patricia Penman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Patton v. Frank et al
as 1:2024cv00463
Plaintiff:
Craig Andrew Patton #356869, Jr.
Defendant:
Unknown Frank, Unknown Shae, Unknown Vanwormer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spirdione #947841 v. Wood
as 1:2024cv00467
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Alan Spirdione #947841
Defendant:
Rebecca Wood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gesualdo v. Indivior, Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65411
Plaintiff:
Francis M Gesualdo
Defendant:
Indivior, Inc., Indivior Solutions, Inc., Indivior PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Baer v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65416
Plaintiff:
Jessica Baer
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Stoneman v. Indivior, Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65415
Plaintiff:
John S. Stoneman
Defendant:
Indivior, Inc., Indivior Solutions, Inc., Indivior PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Koelling v. Indivior, Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65412
Plaintiff:
Misty K. Koelling
Defendant:
Indivior, Inc., Indivior Solutions, Inc., Indivior PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Savernak v. Indivior, Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65414
Plaintiff:
Derrick J. Savernak
Defendant:
Indivior, Inc., Indivior Solutions, Inc., Indivior PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
