Cases 1 - 10 of 24,483
Jones v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00547
Plaintiff:
Curtis L. Jones
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NELSON v. WARDLOW
as 4:2024cv00036
Petitioner:
BILLY JOE NELSON
Respondent:
JERRY WARDLOW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Luther v. Chochran et al
as 1:2024cv01100
Plaintiff:
Jayson Lance Luther
Defendant:
Chochran, Dorton and Obion County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shelton v. Watwood et al
as 1:2024cv01097
Plaintiff:
James Michael Shelton
Defendant:
Brandon Watwood, Frank Strada, Danny H. Goodman, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Owens et al v. Hill et al
as 1:2024cv01096
Plaintiff:
Roderick M Owens and Dwayne Jordan
Defendant:
Ricky Hill, FNU Watkins, f/n/u Gross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gobble v. Lawson et al
as 2:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Charles Gobble
Defendant:
Kori Lawson, W. Smith, Centers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foster v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00530
Petitioner:
Lonnell J. Foster
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Keene v. Phillips
as 2:2024cv00067
Petitioner:
Mario Keene
Respondent:
Shawn Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alexander v. Washington County et al
as 2:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Philemon Alexander
Defendant:
Washington County, B. Jenkins, Ruipert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holloway v. Meltebarger et al
as 3:2024cv00192
Plaintiff:
Travis C Holloway
Defendant:
Jeremy Meltebarger, Stella Hoffman and Union County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
