Cases 11 - 20 of 465
John Doe v. Gundersen Lutheran Health System, Inc.
as 24-1378
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant:
GUNDERSEN LUTHERAN HEALTH SYSTEM, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1178
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
John Beck v. Stewart Inman, et al
as 24-1152
Plaintiff:
JOHN W. BECK
Defendant:
STEWART INMAN and JOHN DOE
Quordalis Sanders v. Wisconsin Department of Community Corrections, et al
as 24-1159
Plaintiff:
QUORDALIS V. SANDERS
Defendant:
WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS, BRIANN GERILER and JOHN DOES, sued as Johon Doe, transportation officers for DCC of Wisconsin Department of Corrections
Joseph James v. Timothy Mace, et al
as 24-1037
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH M. JAMES
Defendant:
TIMOTHY MACE, Corporal Jailer also known as TIMOTHY EARL MACE, DALTON P. PFLUGHAUPT, individual, former employee of Michigan City Civil City, KELLY J. KENNEDY and others
Jordan Watkins v. Brij Mohan, et al
as 24-1151
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JORDAN WATKINS
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIJ MOHAN, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JANE DOES and others
Sam Jones v. Nurse Micah, et al
as 23-3414
Plaintiff:
SAM JONES
Defendant:
NURSE MICAH, Nurse Practitioner, SURGEON GINN and JOHN DOE, Sergeant, Medical Director
Brenda Lucero, et al v. Credit Union Retirement Plan Association, et al
as 24-8001
Petitioner:
BRENDA L. LUCERO, HEATHER BARTON, ILONA KOMPANIIETS and others
Respondent:
CREDIT UNION RETIREMENT PLAN ASSOCIATION, BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CREDIT UNION RETIREMENT PLAN ASSOCIATION, BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF RETIREMENT PLANS and others
John Doe v. Sarah Bush Lincoln Health Center
as 23-3340
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JOHN DOE
Defendant / Appellant:
SARAH BUSH LINCOLN HEALTH CENTER
Martin Fitzpatrick v. Robert Busche, et al
as 23-3053
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARTIN C. FITZPATRICK
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT BUSCHE, Doctor, JOHN DOE, Sergeant, B.K., JOHN DOE 2 and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
