Cases 61 - 70 of 80
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, et al v. Thomas Boyer, et al
as 12-8018
Petitioner:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S., INCORPORATED, SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S., LLC and others
Respondent:
THOMAS BOYER, MICHAEL BRIGGS, ALFRED BROWN and others
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, et al v. Kenneth Anglin, et al
as 12-8016
Petitioner:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S., LLC, SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S., INCORPORATED and others
Respondent:
KENNETH ANGLIN, CAROL BAYONA, individually and on behalf of Lynn Bayona, deceased, JULIE BELLCOCK and others
Ernest Myers v. USA
as 11-1597
Petitioner - Appellant:
ERNEST MYERS
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Ernest Myers v. USA
as 11-1596
Petitioner - Appellant:
ERNEST MYERS
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Bruno Ernst v. Andrea Tack, et al
as 11-1478
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRUNO B. ERNST
Defendant - Appellee:
ANDREA TACK and DICK MYERS
Cleve Jones v. Max Navia, et al
as 10-3242
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLEVE JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
MAX NAVIA, Officer, WILLIAM BUCHANAN, Officer, COOK COUNTY and others
Brian Cleary, et al v. Philip Morris Incorporated, et al
as 10-2960
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRIAN CLEARY, RITA BURKE and INES TAYLOR, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,
Defendant - Appellee:
PHILIP MORRIS INCORPORATED, R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, LIGGETT & MYERS, INCORPORATED and others
Ernest Myers v. USA
as 10-2544
Petitioner - Appellant:
ERNEST MYERS
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Kerry Farina v. Joseph Loftus, et al., et al
as 10-1673
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KERRY J. FARINA
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH LOFTUS, KEITH ANGLIN, Warden, LIEUTENANT MYERS and others
Timothy Myers v. IL Central Railroad Company
as 10-1279
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY MYERS
Defendant - Appellee:
ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY, doing business as Canadian National/Illinois Central Railroad Company
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
