Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Amy Hopkins, et al v. Stericycle, Inc.
as 24-1570
Plaintiff:
AMY HOPKINS, CHERYL LANE and ADRIENNE HAUSE
Defendant:
STERICYCLE, INCORPORATED
Jason Palermo, et al v. Larry Schaedel
as 23-3042
Petitioner / Appellant:
JASON PALERMO, as owner of the vessel BETTER TIMES II, a 1999 Sea Ray 500 Sundancer, IL 0587KX, in rem and WESLEY MURPHY
Respondent / Appellee:
LARRY SCHAEDEL, as independent administrator of the ESTATE OF LANE G. SCHAEDEL, deceased,
Aziz Booker v. Chelsea Gotz, et al
as 23-2416
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AZIZ RAHIM BOOKER
Defendant / Appellee:
CHELSEA FOX GOTZ, MICHELLE LANE, PATRICIA A. RILEY and others
USA v. Mark Lane
as 23-1959
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MARK ALAN LANE
Brent Mullis v. Chris Lane
as 23-1946
Petitioner / Appellant:
BRENT D. MULLIS
Respondent / Appellee:
CHRIS LANE, Sheriff, Bartholomew County, Indiana
Mark Lane v. Jonathan Hemingway
as 23-1526
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARK ALAN LANE
Respondent / Appellee:
FCI MILAN WARDEN and JONATHAN HEMINGWAY
Deighan Law LLC, et al v. J. Gilbert
as 22-2083
Petitioner:
DEIGHAN LAW LLC, doing business as UpRight Law LLC and JAMES E. FORD
Respondent:
J. PHIL GILBERT
Interested Party:
NANCY J. GARGULA, BOYCE ALLEN BURNS, Debtor and AMANDA LANE BURNS, Debtor
Jeffery Lane v. Structural Iron Workers Local No. 1 Pension Trust
as 22-1149
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFERY LANE
Defendant / Appellee:
STRUCTURAL IRON WORKERS LOCAL NO. 1 PENSION TRUST FUND
Manetirony Clervrain v. Kilolo Kijakazi, et al
as 22-1078
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MANETIRONY CLERVRAIN
Defendant / Appellee:
DAN RUSYNIAK, MICHAEL A. GARGANO, PAUL BOWLING and others
Mark Van Vleet v. Mt. Carmel Police Department, et al
as 22-1017
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK A. VAN VLEET
Defendant / Appellee:
MT. CARMEL POLICE DEPARTMENT, CASSANDRA GOLDMAN, JAMES LANE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
