Cases 1 - 10 of 421
Nat'l Association for Rational Sexual Offense Laws, et al v. Latoya Hughes
as 24-2103
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR RATIONAL SEXUAL OFFENSE LAWS and JASON RIDLEY
Defendant:
LATOYA HUGHES, in her official capacity as Acting Director of the Illinois Department of Corrections
Patrick Kurkowski, et al v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-2086
Plaintiff:
PATRICK KURKOWSKI, KENNETH DALBERG, EDGAR SALINAS-LEAL and others
Defendant:
WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, KEVIN CARR, JARED HOY and others
Don Lippert, et al v. Quentin Tanner, et al
as 24-1998
Plaintiff:
DON LIPPERT, WILLIAM E. BASSETT, MILAM MARTIN and others
Defendant:
QUENTIN TANNER, SALVADOR A. GODINEZ, ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Anthony Woodridge v. Cook County Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-1968
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY WOODRIDGE
Defendant:
COOK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, G. MOORE and SEAN JONES
Jeffrey Akard v. Mark Sevier, et al
as 24-1971
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY AKARD
Defendant:
MARK R. SEVIER, Warden, COMMISSIONER OF THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Stephen Durr v. State of Illinois, et al
as 24-1939
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN DURR
Defendant:
STATE OF ILLINOIS and ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Anthony Harris v. County of Cook, et al
as 24-1878
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY HARRIS
Defendant:
COUNTY OF COOK, THOMAS J. DART, LIEUTENANT DELITZ and others
Kareen Hayes v. Department of Corrections
as 24-1828
Plaintiff:
KAREEN HAYES
Defendant:
WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
John Couch v. State of Indiana, et al
as 24-1655
Plaintiff:
JOHN L. COUCH
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA, NOBLESVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, HAMILTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and others
Kevin J. Bure v. Centurion Health Service LLC, et al
as 24-1593
Plaintiff:
KEVIN J. BURE
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC and INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, Westville Correctional Facility
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
