Cases 1 - 10 of 418
Anthony Woodridge v. Cook County Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-1968
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY WOODRIDGE
Defendant:
COOK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, G. MOORE and SEAN JONES
Jeffrey Akard v. Mark Sevier, et al
as 24-1971
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY AKARD
Defendant:
MARK R. SEVIER, Warden, COMMISSIONER OF THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Stephen Durr v. State of Illinois, et al
as 24-1939
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN DURR
Defendant:
STATE OF ILLINOIS and ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Anthony Harris v. County of Cook, et al
as 24-1878
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY HARRIS
Defendant:
COUNTY OF COOK, THOMAS J. DART, LIEUTENANT DELITZ and others
Kareen Hayes v. Department of Corrections
as 24-1828
Plaintiff:
KAREEN HAYES
Defendant:
WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
John Couch v. State of Indiana, et al
as 24-1655
Plaintiff:
JOHN L. COUCH
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA, NOBLESVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, HAMILTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and others
Kevin J. Bure v. Centurion Health Service LLC, et al
as 24-1593
Plaintiff:
KEVIN J. BURE
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC and INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, Westville Correctional Facility
Brian Futch, et al v. Jay Pritzker, et al
as 24-1536
Plaintiff:
BRIAN FUTCH, JEFFREY BROWN, RICHARD LEDBETTER and others
Defendant:
JAY R. PRITZKER, in his official capacity as the Governor of the State of Illinois, ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF CENTRAL MANAGEMENT SERVICES and others
Donyiell Brown v. Cook County Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-1498
Plaintiff:
DONYIELL T. BROWN
Defendant:
COOK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, COOK COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, THOMAS J. DART and others
Johnnie Flournoy v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc.
as 24-1465
Plaintiff:
JOHNNIE FLOURNOY
Defendant:
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC. and ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
