Cases 1 - 10 of 123
Patrick Bakturski v. Darren Galloway, et al
as 24-2358
Plaintiff:
PATRICK BAKTURSKI
Defendant:
DARREN GALLOWAY, Warden, LATOYA HUGHES and DARREN GALLOWAY, Warden, Warden of Operations, Shawnee CC
Don Lippert, et al v. Latoya Hughes, et al
as 24-2333
Defendant:
STEVEN BOWMAN, J.B. PRITZKER and LATOYA HUGHES
Plaintiff:
LEWIS RICE, JOHN RUFFIN, DEBRA PATTISON and others
Don Lippert, et al v. Latoya Hughes, et al
as 24-2210
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM E. BASSETT, MILAM MARTIN, OZELL GRAYER and others
Defendant:
STEVEN BOWMAN, JOHN BALDWIN, BRUCE V. RAUNER and others
Eugene Westmoreland v. Latoya Hughes
as 24-2153
Plaintiff:
EUGENE WESTMORELAND
Defendant:
LATOYA HUGHES
Nat'l Association for Rational Sexual Offense Laws, et al v. Latoya Hughes
as 24-2103
Defendant:
LATOYA HUGHES, in her official capacity as Acting Director of the Illinois Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR RATIONAL SEXUAL OFFENSE LAWS and JASON RIDLEY
Don Lippert, et al v. Latoya Hughes, et al
as 24-1998
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM E. BASSETT, LEWIS RICE, OZELL GRAYER and others
Defendant:
ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, STEVEN BOWMAN, Doctor, Agency Medical Director of IDOC, LOUIS SHICKER, Doctor and others
Micheal Attaway v. Darren Galloway, et al
as 24-1985
Defendant:
AMANDA SMITH, Mental Health Director, Shawnee CC, LATOYA HUGHES, Director, IDOC, WARDEN WALKER, Prison Warden, Shawnee CC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHEAL N.B. ATTAWAY
Matthew Peterson v. Thomas Dart, et al
as 24-1585
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW PETERSON
Defendant:
THOMAS J. DART, DARRYL HOUSTON, HUGH WALSH and others
Charles Robinson v. Latoya Hughes, et al
as 24-1519
Plaintiff:
CHARLES MOHAMED ROBINSON, also known as Charles D. Robinson
Defendant:
LATOYA HUGHES, DISTRICT ONE PAROLE RE-ENTRY GROUP DEPUTY CHIEF, DISTRICT ONE PAROLE RE-ENTRY GROUP SUPERVISOR and others
David Delgado v. Latoya Hughes, et al
as 24-1407
Plaintiff:
DAVID DELGADO
Defendant:
LATOYA HUGHES, MARK WILLIAMS, JASON GARZA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
