Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Lawrence Lingle v. Alfreda Kibby, et al
as 17-3479
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAWRENCE LINGLE
Defendant - Appellee:
ALFREDA KIBBY, EUGENE MCADORY, SHAN JUMPER and others
Michael Davis v. Donald Moroney, et al
as 16-2471
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
DONALD MORONEY, Correctional Officer, Pontiac Correctional Center, KIMBERLY KELLEY, Correctional Counselor, Pontiac Correctional Center, S. SIMPSON, Grievance Officer, Pontiac Correctional Center and others
Lawrence Lingle v. Alfreda Kibby, et al
as 16-1466
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAWRENCE LINGLE
Defendant - Appellee:
ALFREDA KIBBY, EUGENE MCADORY, SHAN JUMPER and others
Lawrence Lingle v. Alfreda Kibby, et al
as 15-1975
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAWRENCE LINGLE
Defendant - Appellee:
ALFREDA KIBBY, EUGENE MCADORY, SHAN JUMPER and others
Lawrence Lingle v. Forrest Ashby
as 14-2195
Petitioner - Appellant:
LAWRENCE LINGLE
Respondent - Appellee:
FORREST J. ASHBY
Lawrence Lingle v. Forrest Ashby
as 13-3888
Petitioner - Appellant:
LAWRENCE LINGLE
Respondent - Appellee:
FORREST J. ASHBY
Jeremy Schloss, et al v. Forrest J. Ashby, et al
as 12-2971
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEREMY SCHLOSS, WALTER PEGUES, DON J. EVANS and others
Defendant - Appellee:
FOREST ASHBY, ALFREDA KIBBY, LARRY J. PHILLIPS and others
Lawrence Lingle v. Alfreda Kibby, et al
as 12-2720
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAWRENCE LINGLE
Defendant - Appellee:
ALFREDA KIBBY, EUGENE MCADORY and SHAN JUMPER
George Gutierrez v. Ray A. McSchooler, et al
as 11-3037
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE GUTIERREZ
Defendant - Appellee:
R. MCSCHOOLER, Correctional Officer, individually and in official capacity, OFFICER HOWARTER, Correctional Officer, individually and in official capacity, B. BROWN, Lieutenant, individually and in official capacity and others
Cordell Sanders v. David Lingle, et al
as 10-3255
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CORDELL SANDERS
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID LINGLE and SHEL RHONE-PLASKETT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
