Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Pearl Henyard v. CTA, et al
as 24-1702
Plaintiff:
PEARL HENYARD
Defendant:
CHICAGO TRANSIT AUTHORITY and PACE
USA v. Roger Pace
as 21-2151
Defendant / Appellant:
ROGER E. PACE
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Pearl Henyard v. MV Transportation, et al
as 21-2141
Defendant / Appellee:
MV TRANSPORTATION, PACE SUBURBAN BUS SERVICE and PACE, the Suburban Bus Division of the Regional Transportation Authority
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PEARL HENYARD
Jerry Beauford v. Pace Bus Company, et al
as 21-1436
Defendant / Appellee:
PACE BUS COMPANY and VRDOLYAK LAW GROUP
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JERRY BEAUFORD
Pearl Henyard v. MV Transportation, et al
as 20-3462
Defendant / Appellee:
MV TRANSPORTATION and PACE SUBURBAN BUS SERVICE
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PEARL A. HENYARD and PEARL HENYARD
Aimee Hankins v. Dennis Burton, et al
as 17-2077
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AIMEE HANKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
DENNIS BURTON, Probation Officer, Sharp County Arkansas, CRAIG CRONISTER, Probation Officer, State of Missouri, RAYMOND PACE, Sheriff, Ozark County Missouri and others
Defendant:
TIM LOWE, Probation Officer, Mercer County Illinois
John Redmond, IV v. Eric Williams, et al
as 16-2263
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN H. REDMOND, IV
Defendant - Appellee:
ERIC WILLIAMS, Sheriff, RICK PACE, Major, OFFICER ELSFELDER, Confinement and others
Samuel L. Pace v. Randy Pfister
as 14-3345
Petitioner - Appellant:
SAMUEL L. PACE
Respondent - Appellee:
RANDY PFISTER
Jeanne Pace, et al v. Timmerman's Ranch and Saddle S, et al
as 14-1940
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEANNE PACE and DAN PACE
Defendant - Appellee:
TIMMERMAN'S RANCH AND SADDLE SHOP INCOPORATED, CAROL TIMMERMAN, TAMMY RIGSBY and others
Alonzo Butler v. City of Harvey, et al
as 12-2087
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALONZO BULTER
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF HARVEY, a municipal corporation, JEFF CROCKER, Star No. 602 and PACE BUS COMPANY, Suburban Bus Division of the Regional Transportation Authority
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
