Cases 1 - 10 of 431
Warren Beals v. Lieutenant Yarber, et al
as 24-1841
Plaintiff:
WARREN A. BEALS
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT YARBER, SERGEANT LEFFLER and SERGEANT KOLARICK
Brandon Johnson v. Sergeant Allman, et al
as 24-1821
Plaintiff:
BRANDON L. JOHNSON
Defendant:
SERGEANT ALLMAN and JOHN DOE, 3
Challie Gray v. John Poor, et al
as 24-1780
Plaintiff:
CHALLIE A. GRAY
Defendant:
JOHN POOR, Sergeant, JAIME DOWNS, Officer and RICHARD FLEURY, Officer
Demajio Ellis v. Linda Carper, et al
as 24-1755
Plaintiff:
DEMAJIO J. ELLIS
Defendant:
LINDA CARPER, JOHNATHAN JACKSON, Sergeant, BRIAN MARTZ and others
Jamie Santmyer v. Encarnacion Cortez, et al
as 24-1345
Plaintiff:
JAMIE SANTMYER
Defendant:
ENCARNACION CORTEZ, Sergeant and THOMAS J. DART
Andy Williams, Jr. v. City of Aurora, Illinois, et al
as 24-1635
Plaintiff:
ANDY H. WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant:
CITY OF AURORA, ILLINOIS, MAYOR RICHARD IRVIN AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF AURORA, KRISTEN ZIMAN and others
Bobby Johnson v. Lucas Maue, et al
as 24-1254
Plaintiff:
BOBBY JOHNSON
Defendant:
LUCAS MAUE, C/O, Menard CC, TERRANCE JACKSON, C/O, Menard CC, GARRETT GRIFFIN, C/O, Menard CC and others
Virgil Griffin v. Douglas Wardlow, et al
as 24-1145
Plaintiff:
VIRGIL E. GRIFFIN
Defendant:
DOUGLAS WARDLOW, Major, Correctional Officer, individually and in their official capacity, DUJUAN D. LOTT, Sergeant, Lieutenant, Correctional Officer, individually and in their official capacity, ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., Commissioner, individually and in their official capacity and others
Joseph James v. Timothy Mace, et al
as 24-1037
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH M. JAMES
Defendant:
TIMOTHY MACE, Corporal Jailer also known as TIMOTHY EARL MACE, DALTON P. PFLUGHAUPT, individual, former employee of Michigan City Civil City, KELLY J. KENNEDY and others
Brandon Johnson v. Larry Haskell, et al
as 24-1156
Plaintiff:
BRANDON L. JOHNSON
Defendant:
LARRY HASKELL, Sergeant and BRANDON STOVALL, Sergeant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
