Cases 1 - 10 of 91
Walid Abdulla v. BOP, et al
as 24-2319
Defendant:
WILLIAM WATSON, Doctor, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
WALID H. ABDULLA
Shannon Agofsky v. BOP, et al
as 24-2007
Plaintiff:
SHANNON WAYNE AGOFSKY
Defendant:
ANDRE MATEVOUSIAN, COLETTE S. PETERS, STEVE KALLIS, Warden and others
Andre' Drew v. Unit Case Manager Murphy, et al
as 24-1116
Plaintiff:
ANDRE' DREW
Defendant:
UNIT CASE MANAGER MURPHY, INSTRUCTOR SHAW, Drug Education Coordinator, COORDINATOR GAUTHIER, Drug Treatment Program and others
Ronnie Martin v. BOP, et al
as 23-2440
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONNIE MARTIN, Holy Prophet known as Ronnie Bo Author of the Holy Trap Scriptures
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, MICHAEL CARVAJAL, Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons, RUSSELL HEISNER, Warden of Metropolitan Correctional Center and others
Terrance Alden v. BOP, et al
as 23-2229
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERRANCE ALDEN
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Jack Morgan v. BOP, et al
as 22-2731
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JACK WILLIAM MORGAN
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and WARDEN CIOLLI
Robert Decker v. BOP
as 22-2475
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT K. DECKER
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Fairly Earls v. BOP
as 22-2023
Petitioner / Appellant:
FAIRLY W. EARLS
Respondent / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Charles Simon v. DOJ, et al
as 22-1996
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES SIMON
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, U.S. District Court Judge, District of Columbia, Civil Action No. 20-0580, FEDERAL PRISON INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED and others
Bralen Jordan v. BOP, et al
as 21-3301
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRALEN LAMAR JORDAN
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., Director, General Counsel and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
