Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Ty-Juan Keith v. People of the State of Illinois
as 22-3156
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TY-JUAN KEITH
Defendant / Appellee:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
Teddy Driver v. Ty Solomon, et al
as 22-2151
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TEDDY H. DRIVER
Defendant / Appellee:
TY SOLOMON, Kokomo Police Officer #372, TRAVIS WILLIAMS, Kokomo Police Officer #387, CODY RAYLS, Kokomo Police Officer, a.k.a. OFFICER CODY RAYLES and others
Teddy Driver v. Ty Solomon, et al
as 22-1866
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TEDDY H. DRIVER
Defendant / Appellee:
TY SOLOMON, Kokomo Police Officer #372, TRAVIS WILLIAMS, Kokomo Police Officer #387, CODY RAYLS, Kokomo Police Officer, a.k.a. OFFICER CODY RAYLES and others
USA v. Clifton Robinson
as 21-1250
Defendant / Appellant:
CLIFTON ROBINSON, also known as TY
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Clifton Robinson
as 18-3426
Defendant / Appellant:
CLIFTON ROBINSON, also known as TY
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Clifton Robinson
as 18-2399
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CLIFTON ROBINSON, also known as TY
David Bentz v. Salvador Godinez, et al
as 18-1684
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID ROBERT BENTZ
Defendant - Appellee:
SALVADOR A. GODINEZ, DONALD STOLWORTHY, GLADYSE TAYLOR and others
Lincoln Lee v. Jay Shepler, et al
as 15-3431
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LINCOLN A. LEE
Defendant - Appellant:
JAY SHEPLER, Counselor at Illinois River Correctional Center, ALAN L. COMBITES, Correctional Officer at Illinois River Correctional Center, TY EASLEY, Internal Affairs Correctional Officer at Illinois River Correctional Center and others
Ty Evans v. Dushan Zatecky
as 14-1670
Petitioner - Appellant:
TY EVANS
Respondent - Appellee:
DUSHAN ZATECKY, Superintendent
USA v. H. Warner
as 14-1330
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
H. TY WARNER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
