Cases 1 - 10 of 75
Squellati v. Bohm et al
as 1:2024cv01326
Defendant:
Ryan Bohm, All Members of Livingston County Board, John and Jane Does and others
Plaintiff:
William Squellati
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hendricks et al v. Bohm et al
as 1:2024cv01321
Defendant:
Ryan Bohm, John and Jane Doe, . Draper and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Hendricks and Armond Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Poch v. Bohm et al
as 1:2024cv01300
Defendant:
Lisa Draper, Ryan Bohm and John or Jane Does
Plaintiff:
Eric Poch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harrison v. US Bank et al
as 2:2024cv02191
Defendant:
Floyd M. Willoughby, John and Jane Does 1-9, Jeremy Richey and others
Plaintiff:
Lyle Roger Harrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hendricks et al v. Grootens et al
as 3:2024cv03163
Defendant:
Robert Reich, Mark Dietrich, Tim Finley and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Hendricks and Justin Snow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blakey v. Hinthorne et al
as 1:2024cv01206
Defendant:
Cherryle Hinthorne, . Thrush, Steven Hubbard and others
Plaintiff:
Carroll Blakey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winston v. Schmidt et al
as 4:2024cv04099
Plaintiff:
Andre Winston
Defendant:
. Jumper, . Carreon, Elizabeth Schmidt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cox v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2023cv03359
Plaintiff:
Larry Cox
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Latoya Hughes, Wexford Health Sources Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winston v. Shah et al
as 4:2023cv04224
Plaintiff:
Andre Winston
Defendant:
Viper Shah, . Savage, . Shawgo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Loy v. Donathan et al
as 4:2023cv04149
Plaintiff:
John Loy
Defendant:
Greg Donathan, Sharon Coleman-Deems, Sandra Simpson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
