Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Cases 41 - 50 of 40,903
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00170
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Kinsey v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00193
Plaintiff: Tony P Kinsey
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Holm v. Galipeau et al
as 3:2024cv00384
Plaintiff: Austin Jeremiah Holm
Defendant: J Galipeau and Bridegroom
Not Yet Classified: WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Glassel v. Neal et al
as 3:2024cv00387
Plaintiff: Christopher J Glassel
Defendant: Ron Neal, Raccio and Sherri Fritter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chase v. Rebecca Fisher Law Firm et al
as 2:2024cv00163
Plaintiff: Linda C Chase
Defendant: Rebecca Fisher Law Firm and Rebecca L Fisher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Brown v. South Bend Community School Corporation et al
as 3:2024cv00377
Plaintiff: Heidi Davonne Brown
Defendant: South Bend Community School Corporation and Department of Child Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Yoder v. DeGuilio et al
as 3:2024cv00378
Plaintiff: Philip J Yoder
Defendant: Jon E DeGuilio, John M Maciejczyk, Miguel Oviedo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00167
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00162
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Stanton v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00382
Petitioner: Daniel Stanton, Jr
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?