Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Cases 31 - 40 of 19,330
DURHAM v. WADAS
as 2:2024cv00318
Petitioner: AKIEM DURHAM
Respondent: WADAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BYRER v. WARDEN
as 2:2024cv00317
Petitioner: SHANELLE BYRER
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
THURMAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv01028
Petitioner: CORDNEY THURMAN
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
HIPPS v. MILLER et al
as 3:2024cv00103
Plaintiff: NATHAN ROBERT HIPPS
Defendant: LUCAS MILLER, SWAIN and LAFAR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARKER v. LARSEN et al
as 1:2024cv01025
Plaintiff: TIMOTHY PARKER
Defendant: TAD LARSEN, FOUR UNKNOWN MARION COUNTY DEPUTIES and UNKNOWN MEDICAL PERSONNEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GADDIS v. DUNLAP et al
as 1:2024cv01026
Plaintiff: JAMAR GADDIS
Defendant: DUNLAP, DUSTIN, BAKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LENOIR v. JOHNSON COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2024cv01027
Plaintiff: SHAQUILLE DELSHAUN LENOIR and ARYN DESHAE MARIE
Defendant: JOHNSON COUNTY JAIL, JOHNSON COUNTY SHERRIFF DEPARTMENT, PSYCH DOCTOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STOVALL v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2024cv00146
Plaintiff: DANIEL C. STOVALL
Defendant: VANIHEL and WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCOTT v. CENTERION CORPERATION et al
as 1:2024cv01021
Plaintiff: EDDRELL SCOTT
Defendant: CENTERION CORPERATION, VERDON, ALLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MULLIS v. PRETORIOUS
as 2:2024cv00315
Petitioner: BRETT DEWAYNE MULLIS
Respondent: TRICIA PRETORIOUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?