Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Cases 31 - 40 of 87
WALTERS v. CRANK et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv00568
Defendant: CHERYL PETTY, ANASTASIA BARNHART, STEPHANIE CRANK and others
Plaintiff: LANCE WALTERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALTERS v. BETHEL et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv00458
Defendant: KEYES, PEREZ, JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff: LANCE WALTERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALTERS v. WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES INC. et al
as 2:2019cv00459
Defendant: CHERYL PETTY, SUSAN SMOOTHERLY, PABLO PEREZ and others
Plaintiff: LANCE WALTERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALTERS v. CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICES INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv00415
Defendant: TONI JORDAN, RACHAEL HOUGHTON, JANE DOE and others
Plaintiff: LANCE WALTERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARROLL v. KEEDY We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv02554
Defendant: DUSTIN KEEDY
Plaintiff: WALTER LEE CARROLL, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOXLEY v. BUTT
as 1:2018cv03246
Defendant: WALTER BUTT
Plaintiff: CORTEZ BOXLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADAMS v. CORIZON HEALTH MEDICAL PROVIDER, INC. et al
as 1:2018cv03165
Defendant: LAURA BODKIN, TOM RICHARDSON, CAMAY FRANCUM and others
Plaintiff: NATHAN LAMONT ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HUMPHREY v. HANNON et al
as 4:2018cv00145
Defendant: COREY HULS, NATHAN ABBOTT, BRANDON FARIAS and others
Plaintiff: TRAVIS L. HUMPHREY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARRIS v. ZATECKY et al
as 1:2018cv02009
Defendant: DUSHAN ZATECKY, WALTER PETERSON, DUANE ALSIP and others
Plaintiff: HOWARD HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BURROUGHS v. WARDEN
as 1:2018cv01305
Petitioner: WALTER BURROUGHS
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?