Cases 1 - 10 of 20
WALTERS v. WELLPATH et al
as 1:2024cv00978
Plaintiff:
LANCE WALTERS and CARINA WALTERS
Defendant:
WELLPATH, AKANBI and KERRY J. FORRESTAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALTERS v. HARRINGTON et al
as 1:2024cv00776
Plaintiff:
LANCE W. WALTERS
Defendant:
HARRINGTON, MARION COUNTY SHERRIFF'S DEPT., KERRY FORRESTAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. FORRESTAL et al
as 1:2024cv00788
Plaintiff:
JOHN ERIC THOMAS
Defendant:
KERRY J. FORRESTAL, PAIGE WHITE and GINA WHITE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALTERS et al v. FORRESTAL et al
as 1:2024cv00691
Plaintiff:
LANCE WALTERS and CARINA WALTERS
Defendant:
KERRY J. FORRESTAL, VASQUEZ, T. JADRICH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALTERS v. FORRESTAL et al
as 1:2024cv00693
Plaintiff:
LANCE WAYNE WALTERS and CARINA
Defendant:
KERRY J. FORRESTAL, SITZMAN, OROZCO-JIMENEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALTERS v. BELLO et al
as 1:2024cv00449
Plaintiff:
LANA W. WALTERS and LANCE W. WALTERS
Defendant:
T. BELLO, SALAJA, DEPUTY U and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALTERS v. FORRESTAL et al
as 1:2024cv00202
Plaintiff:
LANCE W. WALTERS
Defendant:
KERRY J. FORRESTAL, TRINITY FOOD SERVICES GROUP, H. SOLAJA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FORREST v. VANIHEL
as 2:2023cv00489
Petitioner:
JASON B. FORREST
Respondent:
FRANK VANIHEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FORREST v. WARDEN
as 2:2022cv00347
Plaintiff:
GARY FORREST
Defendant:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SPARKS v. FORRESTAL
as 1:2022cv00037
Plaintiff:
DAVID LEE SPARKS
Defendant:
KERRY J. FORRESTAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
