Cases 1 - 10 of 53
GILMAN v. BYRD et al
as 2:2023cv00082
Plaintiff:
JAMES GILMAN
Defendant:
SAMUEL BYRD, CHELSEA PEARSON, BARBARA RIGGS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FUGATE v. PIERCE et al
as 1:2020cv02361
Defendant:
SARA SCOTT, PIERCE, STACIE HOWARD and others
Plaintiff:
DALE RAY FUGATE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOYD v. STATON et al
as 1:2020cv02287
Defendant:
COURTNEY LEANNE STATON, DANIEL WHITEHEAD, THOMAS NEWMAN and others
Plaintiff:
DEREK LEE BOYD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH et al v. SAINT PAUL TRAVELERS COMPANY INC. et al
as 1:2019cv00598
Defendant:
BOB STELLER, MOBILE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT INC., EDDIE CURRAN and others
Plaintiff:
EDMOND HUDMOND SMITH, IV and LOUIS HOLGER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ANDERSON v. HAWK et al
as 1:2016cv02391
Defendant:
RACHEL ALACANTARA, BARKAS, BELHUEMER and others
Plaintiff:
ANTAEUS ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GILES v. BAILEY et al
as 2:2016cv00333
Defendant:
BAILEY, GENEVIEVE DAUGHTERY, GOSSETT and others
Plaintiff:
DAMON GILES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
ABNER v. EVERSON et al
as 4:2016cv00136
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE ABNER, JR.
Defendant:
MICHAEL CAROUTHERS, RONALD EVERSON, CHARLES MURPHY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SHEAFFER v. CAROUTHERS et al
as 4:2016cv00131
Defendant:
MICHAEL CAROUTHERS, RONALD EVERSON, CHARLES MURPHY and others
Plaintiff:
BRYCE ALLEN SHEAFFER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EARLY v. SHEPHERD et al
as 2:2016cv00085
Defendant:
IAN CONNORS, PAUL M. LAIRD, LEANN LARIVA and others
Plaintiff:
LOUIS H. EARLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
DAVIS v. LARIVA
as 2:2015cv00403
Petitioner:
JIM WESLEY DAVIS
Respondent:
LEANN LARIVA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
