Cases 1 - 10 of 2,230
BRADFORD v. WADAS
as 2:2024cv00271
Petitioner:
CHARLES E. BRADFORD
Respondent:
J. WADAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
SNELLING v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00256
Plaintiff:
MARTY E. SNELLING
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, DURREGAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
APPEL v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
GLEN E. APPEL, JR.
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, TRICIA PRETORUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PHILLIPS v. ERNEST et al
as 2:2024cv00233
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. PHILLIPS
Defendant:
ERNEST, JACKSON, WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PHILLIPS v. MJEAN et al
as 2:2024cv00234
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. PHILLIPS
Defendant:
MJEAN, NEFF and HEOLTERBRAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PHILLIPS v. ELLIS et al
as 2:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. PHILLIPS
Defendant:
MIKE ELLIS, JESSE and C. POPE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BENFORD v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00208
Plaintiff:
MALIK E. BENFORD
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, TRICIA PRETORIUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PHILLIPS v. MJEAN et al
as 2:2024cv00200
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. PHILLIPS
Defendant:
MJEAN, NEFF and HEOLTERBRAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00833
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TUMULTY v. VANDERBURGH COUNTY SHERIFF, et al.
as 3:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY E. TUMULTY
Defendant:
VANDERBURGH COUNTY SHERIFF, ZUBER and KARGES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
