Cases 91 - 100 of 31,277
Gonzales v. Swanson
as 1:2024cv00693
Plaintiff:
Antonio B Gonzales
Defendant:
Mark Swanson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cross v. Plaskey et al
as 2:2024cv00689
Plaintiff:
James Cross
Defendant:
Tracy Plaskey, Amber Moeller, Nicole Schwaller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knight v. Wojectka
as 2:2024cv00690
Plaintiff:
DeWayne D Knight
Defendant:
Dr Marieta Wojectka
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harper v. Stevens et al
as 2:2024cv00694
Plaintiff:
Kevin O Harper
Defendant:
Christopher Stevens, John Kind, Dylon Radtke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FNA Group Inc v. JD North America Corp
as 2:2024cv00692
Plaintiff:
FNA Group Inc
Defendant:
JD North America Corp
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Jozefyk v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00697
Plaintiff:
Christopher M. Jozefyk
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Nies et al v. Astrel et al
as 1:2024cv00446
Interpleader:
Wisconsin Department of Health Services d/b/a ForwardHealth
Plaintiff:
Esther Dies, CIGNA National Health Insurance Company, Wisconsin Department of Health Services d/b/a BadgerCare Plus and others
Defendant:
Daniel Astrel, KLLM Transport Services and ABC Insurance Company
Intervenor:
UnitedHealthcare
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00440
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Reese v. Sturm
as 2:2024cv00687
Plaintiff:
Thomas Reese
Defendant:
Nancy Sturm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reese v. Goulee et al
as 2:2024cv00688
Plaintiff:
Thomas Reese
Defendant:
Michael D Goulee, Jorge Gomez, Craig Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
