Cases 61 - 70 of 364
United States of America v. Ahuja
as 2:2018cv01934
Defendant:
Arvind Ahuja
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Thompson v The ADT Corporation
as 2:2018cv00452
Defendant:
The ADT Corporation
Plaintiff:
Tammy Thompson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693
FREEMAN v. OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, INC.
as 1:2018cv03844
Plaintiff:
DEMONA FREEMAN
Defendant:
OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC and OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Marquez v. RCKC Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv07977
Defendant:
McDonald's Corporation, Connz Corp., Conn Group Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Norma Marquez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Pink Mink LLC et al v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
as 1:2018cv07978
Defendant:
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION AS RECEIVER FOR WASHINGTON FEDERAL BANK FOR SAVINGS and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Plaintiff:
PINK MINK, LLC, FIELDRUSH, LLC, Pink Mink LLC and others
Praither et al v. Northbrook Bank & Trust Company et al
as 1:2018cv07411
Defendant:
Tamer Moumen and Northbrook Bank & Trust Company
Plaintiff:
Marcello Caliva and John Praither
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
O'Neal v. Homeland Security Fusion ctr Milwaukee Wisconsin et al
as 2:2018cv01521
Defendant:
Officer Somers, Officer Peter, Milwaukee Wisconsin Fusion ctr & Employee and others
Plaintiff:
Andre O'Neal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Larry Oruta v. Continental Air Transport Comp, et al
as 17-3263
Defendant / Appellee:
COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, FIFTH THIRD BANK, CONTINENTAL AIR TRANSPORT COMPANY, INCORPORATED and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LARRY ORUTA
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Bansley & Kiener, L.L.P.
as 1:2018cv05501
Petitioner:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for Washington Federal Bank for Savings
Respondent:
Bansley & Kiener, L.L.P.
Plaintiff:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
