Cases 91 - 100 of 7,199
D. et al v. Lake Central School Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
Brian D. and Erika D.
Defendant:
Lake Central School Corporation, Larry Veracco and Ron Fredrick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RHODES et al v. JEFFERSON BUILDING COMMISSION et al
as 4:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
GLENN S. RHODES and SHARON YOUNG
Defendant:
JEFFERSON BUILDING COMMISSION, JEFFERSON ENGINEERS OFFICE, MUNICIPALITY AND PUBLIC UTILITIES OF JEFFERSONVILLE INDIANA and others
COUCH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2024cv00608
Plaintiff:
JOHN L. COUCH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and JOE BIDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
AYERS v. CALLAHAN et al
as 1:2024cv00653
Plaintiff:
JARON AYERS
Defendant:
BLAKE CALLAHAN and TOWN OF CHESTERFIELD, IN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Taebel v. Biden
as 2:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
Mitch Taebel
Defendant:
Joe Biden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
FITTS v. QUAKENBUSH et al
as 1:2024cv00300
Plaintiff:
SHANNA CHEATHAM FITTS
Defendant:
SHERIFF DENNIS QUAKENBUSH, SERGEANT PATRICK CLENNON, DENNIS QUAKENBUSH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RUBY v. STILLER et al
as 4:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL R. RUBY
Defendant:
CARRIE STILLER, WILLIAM GRAY, AMANDA C. KELLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taebel v. Indiana State of et al
as 2:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
Mitch Taebel
Defendant:
Indiana State of, Eric Holcomb and Rokita
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Majestic Care Center et al
as 1:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
Teddie B Jones and Teddie Jones
Defendant:
Majestic Care Center, David Early, Mike Kerr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Upshaw v. Custer et al
as 1:2024cv00146
Plaintiff:
Radiance Marie Upshaw
Defendant:
Jason Custer, John Bohdan and Lawrence Shine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
