Cases 11 - 20 of 494
Miles v. Garland et al
as 4:2023cv04193
Plaintiff:
Harry Edwin Miles
Defendant:
Merrick B Garland, Dara L Darrow, Joe Billy McDade and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Eddie Hatch, Jr., et al v. Tom Barrett, et al
as 23-3051
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDDIE L. HATCH, JR. and MICHELLE DAVIS-HATCH
Defendant / Appellee:
TOM BARRETT, JEFF HANEWALL, ANGELIQUE L. SHARPE and others
DAVIS v. DOAN et al
as 2:2023cv00498
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH J DAVIS
Defendant:
CALVIN DOAN, SHAWN KEEN and TERRE HAUTE POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Eddie Hatch, Jr., et al v. Tom Barrett, et al
as 23-3033
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDDIE L. HATCH, JR. and MICHELLE DAVIS-HATCH
Defendant / Appellee:
TOM BARRETT, JEFF HANEWALL, ANGELIQUE L. SHARPE and others
Davis v. City of South Milwaukee et al
as 2:2023cv01399
Plaintiff:
Ontario Davis
Defendant:
City of South Milwaukee and Steve D Streicher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Henderson v. Matsoukas et al
as 1:2023cv14508
Plaintiff:
Marco Henderson
Defendant:
Lake County, Illinois, Renatta Matsoukas, Alex Flores and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
DAVIS II v. IFGB, LLC d/b/a FIVE GUY'S BURGERS AND FRIES et al
as 1:2023cv01683
Plaintiff:
Richard Davis II and RICHARD DAVIS, II
Defendant:
IFGB, LLC, Miracle Ricketts, Shawn Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. TESSMANN et al
as 1:2023cv05945
Plaintiff:
Herman Williams
Defendant:
LUCIAN TESSMANN, Charles Fagan, Gregory Garofalo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kiontae Mack v. City of Chicago, et al
as 23-2662
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KIONTAE MACK
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF CHICAGO, PAUL MADERER, Detective, Star No. 21246, DAVID ROBERTS, Detective, Star No. 20764 and others
Davis v. Lopez
as 1:2023cv05080
Plaintiff:
Crystal Davis
Defendant:
Daniel Lopez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
