Cases 11 - 20 of 82
BHATT et al v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2021cv02873
Plaintiff:
YASHIL BHATT and ZEEL BHATT
Defendant:
BRANDON JOHNSON, ERIC MCDONALD, PEGGY SURBEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHANLEY v. CITY OF EVANSVILLE INDIANA et al
as 3:2021cv00155
Plaintiff:
KRISTI CHANLEY
Defendant:
CITY OF EVANSVILLE INDIANA, MARIO REID, CODY SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morfin v. Cassidy et al
as 1:2021cv05525
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Morfin
Defendant:
Scott Cassidy, Neil Linehan, Colleen Hyland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Warnick v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2021cv04926
Plaintiff:
Devin J. Warnick
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Chicago Police Department, C.J. Sides and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowens v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2021cv00278
Defendant:
Police Officers, Sean Bottom, #18938, CITY OF CHICAGO and others
Plaintiff:
Lamar Bowens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Byrd et al v. McDonald's USA, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv06447
Plaintiff:
Darrell Byrd and James Byrd
Defendant:
McDonald's USA, LLC and McDonald's Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Crawford et al v. McDonald's USA, LLC. et al
as 1:2020cv05132
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline George, Ronnie Thornton, Carrie Salone and others
Defendant:
McDonald's Corporation and McDonald's USA, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McDonald v. Pritzker et al.
as 1:2020cv03653
Defendant:
Governor J.B. Pritzker and Grace B Hou
Plaintiff:
John McDonald
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Sopron v. Cassidy et al
as 1:2019cv08254
Defendant:
Unknown Employees of the City of Chicago, Thomas Ptak, K. Maicke and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Sopron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner v. McDonalds Corporation et al
as 2:2019cv02271
Defendant:
American Family Insurance Corporation and McDonalds Corporation
Plaintiff:
Bobby L Turner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
