Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Arra v. Yurkovich et al
as 1:2013cv08386
Plaintiff:
Thomas R. Arra
Defendant:
Joseph Yurkovich, First Name Unknown Steele and Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young, Michael v. Per Mar Security Services et al
as 3:2013cv00517
Plaintiff:
Michael Young
Defendant:
Per Mar Security Services, Jim Flater and Lucas Last Name Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv08340
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Emberton v. Emery et al
as 1:2011cv01407
Plaintiff:
Janet Emberton
Defendant:
Mike Emery, Fields, Junis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Posey v. Pruger et al
as 1:2010cv03574
Plaintiff:
Tywon Posey
Defendant:
Rocco Pruger, First Name Unknown Keaney, Todd Mueller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kevin Dixie v. United States Postal Service, et al
as 10-1393
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN LEE DIXIE
Defendant - Appellee:
UNKNOWN DEFENDANT, Molley (Last Name Unknown) - Postal Worker and UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Nickson et al v. Rodriguez et al
as 1:2009cv06075
Plaintiff:
Akeisha Nickson, Akeisha Nickson and Akeisha Nickson
Defendant:
Edner Rodriguez, Three Unknown Chicago Police Officers, Unknown Chicago Police Sergeant and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Wright v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2009cv03489
Plaintiff:
Shawn Wright
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Officer Perez, J. Mook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DIXIE v. POSTMASTER
as 1:2009cv00675
Defendant:
POSTMASTER and MOLLEY LAST NAME UNKNOWN
Plaintiff:
KEVIN LEE DIXIE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dixie v Postmaster
as 1:2009cv00140
Defendant:
Postmaster and Molley Last Name Unknown
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lee Dixie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
