Cases 11 - 20 of 48
DeWitt v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv01382
Plaintiff:
Christopher DeWitt
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Jaimie Tylka and Rebekah Dedman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
White v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 1:2017cv08548
Plaintiff:
Hayes White
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. , Monterrey Security Consultants, Inc., Adrian Santos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newman v. The City of Quincy et al
as 3:2017cv03147
Plaintiff:
Ryan J Newman
Defendant:
The City of Quincy, Robert Copley, Kyle Hatch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANZIGER v. CITY OF FRANKLIN et al
as 1:2017cv00755
Plaintiff:
ROCHELLE BANZIGER
Defendant:
ANDREW BREWER, CITY OF FRANKLIN, SHAWN HENSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WILLIAMS v. WAL-MART
as 1:2017cv00005
Defendant:
WAL-MART
Plaintiff:
ANTWONE WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
HERZ v. BAYH et al
as 1:2015cv00434
Defendant:
U.S. SEN. EVAN BAYH, GERALD BEPKO, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF HAMILTON COUNTY and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN WENDY HERZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Jason Walowski v. Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P.
as 15-1106
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JASON WALOWSKI
Defendant - Appellee:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, L.P.
STEELE et al v. WAL-MART et al
as 1:2013cv01490
Defendant:
APA, LESLEY BEST, CITY OF ANDERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff:
ARABIA STEELE, TAJAINA D. STEELE and TAMARA L. STEELE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SRIVASTAVA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2013cv00890
Defendant:
NEWTON ALLEN, BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, GERALD BEPKO and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN HERZ SRIVASTAVA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Lott v. Wal Mart, Inc.
as 3:2013cv00504
Plaintiff:
Eugena Lott
Defendant:
Wal Mart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
