Cases 71 - 80 of 31,452
Williams v. Leach
as 2:2024cv00643
Plaintiff:
Gilbert L Williams, Jr
Defendant:
Heather L Leach
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robert F. Mulligan v. Board of Trustees of Indiana University, et al
as 24-1923
Plaintiff:
ROBERT F. MULLIGAN
Defendant:
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY, KATHRYN GIRTEN, in her official and individual capacities and MICHELLE MALOTT, in her official and individual capacities
Mundy v. Village of Summit et al
as 1:2024cv04277
Plaintiff:
William Mundy
Defendant:
Village of Summit, Sergio Rodriguez, Jerry Hurckes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Mathis v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv04278
Plaintiff:
Jarvis Mathis
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, R. Collins, M. Ferguson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Flinn et al v. City of Evanston
as 1:2024cv04269
Plaintiff:
Margot Flinn, Carol Johnson, Stasys Neimanas and others
Defendant:
City of Evanston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Whalen, Mark et al v. MacKenzie, Dana et al
as 3:2024cv00342
Plaintiff:
Mark Whalen and Jake Whalen
Defendant:
Dana MacKenzie and Tyler Selk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CRAIG v. CRAIG
as 4:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
HOLDEN CRAIG
Defendant:
GRETCHEN CRAIG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cicero v. Total Quality Logistics LLC
as 1:2024cv04286
Plaintiff:
Courtney Cicero
Defendant:
Total Quality Logistics LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Klumpp v. Winnebago County Officers of the Courts
as 1:2024cv00636
Plaintiff:
Michael Klumpp
Defendant:
Winnebago County Officers of the Courts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
David Martin v. Kwame Raoul, et al
as 24-1915
Plaintiff:
DAVID MARTIN
Defendant:
KWAME RAOUL, GREGORY EMMETT AHERN, JR., COUNTY OF COOK and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
