Cases 81 - 90 of 361
NOEL v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2020cv03245
Defendant:
MYLA A. ELDRIDGE, FRANKLIN D. WOOTEN, MARION COUNTY and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES F. NOEL, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GOLLIDAY v. HILL et al
as 2:2020cv00653
Defendant:
KEVIN BARRETT, MARGARET SUSAN HILL, K. REDMAN and others
Plaintiff:
TERRYON M. GOLLIDAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REYNOLDS v. DYKEMA et al
as 1:2021cv00048
Defendant:
DYKEMA, HENRY N. ANGER, LEONARD C. WOLFE and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD J. REYNOLDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cannon Bey et al v. The State of Illinois et al
as 2:2020cv00480
Defendant:
Robert Dyckman, Oak Park, IL Police Department, D Guzman and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher H Cannon Bey, Travis Austin Bey and Damien Holman Bey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. Roe, et. al.
as 4:2020cv00090
Defendant:
Alyssa Rollock, Dawn Gross, Katherine Sermersheim and others
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Neely v. Swinehart et al
as 1:2020cv00433
Defendant:
Officer Adam Swinehart, Deputy S. Geist, S Geist and others
Plaintiff:
William Neely
Not Classified By Court:
C Erik Chickedantz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
TAYLOR v. DIENHART et al
as 1:2020cv03110
Defendant:
K. CUTCLIFF, PHIL BOWERS, MARION COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDERS AGENCY and others
Plaintiff:
EZEKIEL I. TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EDDELMAN v. MYERS et al
as 1:2020cv02925
Defendant:
BARTHOLOMEW COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, MATTHEW A. MYERS and GOVERNMENT OF BARTHOLOMEW COUNTY
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN C. EDDELMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
MERCADO v. YOUNG et al
as 1:2020cv02887
Defendant:
KYLE YOUNG, CITY OF COLUMBUS and MICHAEL RICHARDSON
Plaintiff:
ANGELITO C MERCADO and ANGELITO C. MERCADO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Chambers v. Smith
as 1:2020cv00377
Defendant:
Charles W Smith
Plaintiff:
Jason Chambers
Not Classified By Court:
C Erik Chickedantz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
