Cases 1 - 10 of 21
VAUGHT v. COX et al
as 1:2023cv01788
Plaintiff:
CLYDE D. VAUGHT
Defendant:
SGT. BRANDON COX, OFC. BEN LOUZON, OFC. ELIJAH ALLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Goins v. Corley et al
as 3:2023cv00081
Plaintiff:
Jason Goins
Defendant:
Corporal Marty Corley, Agent Clyde Grass, Agent Larry Koebcke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rutledge v. Illinois Department of Human Services et al
as 1:2019cv02139
Defendant:
Clyde King, Jr., DeJuana Collins, City Of Chicago and others
Plaintiff:
Korey Rutledge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Spitzer et al
as 1:2017cv00076
Plaintiff:
Clyde E Williams, Jr
Defendant:
Mark A Spitzer, Milestone Services, Michelle Burrows and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Earl v. Howard et al
as 1:2017cv00243
Plaintiff:
Clyde Earl
Defendant:
Jonathan J. Howard , Steve Paschos , Tushar Advani and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Earl v. Espejo et al
as 1:2017cv00195
Plaintiff:
Clyde Earl
Defendant:
Antonio Espejo , Juan Gali , Arturo Guzman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Com-ed Electric Company at , al et al
as 1:2016cv05386
Plaintiff:
Clyde Williams
Defendant:
Com-ed Electric Comapny and The Exelon Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Williams v. Dickerson III et al
as 2:2016cv00001
Plaintiff:
Clyde Williams
Defendant:
George Dickerson III, Sigma Security Services, The city and/or State of Indiana and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Dickerson III et al
as 1:2015cv10753
Plaintiff:
Clyde Williams
Defendant:
George Dickerson III, Sigma Security Services, The city and/or State of Indiana and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FISHER ET AL. v. ZENDER FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
as 1:2015cv01876
Plaintiff:
CLYDE A. FISHER and DANIEL DWIGHT FISHER
Defendant:
ZENDER FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
