Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Parents Protecting Our Children, UA v. Eau Claire Area School District, Wisconsin et al
as 3:2022cv00508
Plaintiff:
Parents Protecting Our Children, UA
Defendant:
Eau Claire Area School District, Wisconsin, Tim Nordin, Lori Bica and others
Amicus Curiae:
Kristoffer J. Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anthony Patrick v. City of Chicago, et al
as 22-1425
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY LEROY PATRICK
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF CHICAGO, KEITH T. FUELLING, ANTHONY J. MARTIN and others
Martin v. Brady et al
as 1:2020cv00447
Defendant:
Susan L Collins and Holly A Brady
Plaintiff:
Nick J Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoff v. City of Evanston et al
as 1:2017cv03058
Plaintiff:
Heidi Hoff
Defendant:
City of Evanston , Alice Ward , Dagmara Koste and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lucinda Lovett, et al v. Landon Herbert, et al
as 17-1668
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LUCINDA LOVETT, Co-Personal Representative of the estate of Daniel J. Martin and MICHAEL LOVETT, Co-Personal Representative of the Estate of Daniel J. Martin
Defendant - Appellant:
LANDON HERBERT and ZACHARY OVERTON
Martin v. Herny et al
as 1:2016cv00261
Plaintiff:
Nick J Martin
Defendant:
Tom Herny, Gary Hamilton, David Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Herny et al
as 1:2016cv00044
Plaintiff:
Nick J Martin
Defendant:
Marty Herny, Tommy Essiex, Coca Cola and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Hamilton et al
as 1:2016cv00035
Plaintiff:
Nick J Martin
Defendant:
G Hamilton, Tom Herny, Jerome Ridley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Herrbold
as 1:2008cv00231
Plaintiff:
Phillip J Martin
Defendant:
Kara M Herrbold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Albert Martin v. Northwestern Mutual Life Insur
as 08-1578
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALBERT J. MARTIN
Defendant - Appellee:
NORTHWESTERN MUTUAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
