Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Lyle Harrison v. Richard Broch, et al
as 23-2743
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LYLE R. HARRISON
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARD L. BROCH, in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as Circuit Judge, JEREMY R. RICHEY, in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as States Attorney, CYNTHIA J. BRADEN, in her individual capacity and in her official capacity as Circuit Clerk and others
Lyle Harrison v. Richard Broch, et al
as 23-2403
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LYLE R. HARRISON
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARD L. BROCH, in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as Circuit Judge, JEREMY R. RICHEY, in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as States Attorney, CYNTHIA J. BRADEN, in her individual capacity and in her official capacity as Circuit Clerk and others
Harrison v. Broch et al
as 2:2022cv02234
Plaintiff:
Lyle Roger Harrison
Defendant:
Richard L Broch, Jeremy R Richey, Cynthia J Braden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Wehmeyer v. Bolka et al
as 2:2018cv00015
Plaintiff:
Janet Wehmeyer
Defendant:
Derek Bolka, Nancy Seeley, Diane Wyszynski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOCKLEAR v. HERALD et al
as 4:2016cv00085
Defendant:
ADVANCED CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE, INC., NADIR AL-SHAMI, JEREMY ARNOLD and others
Plaintiff:
ELAINE LOCKLEAR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lozano et al v. Indiana Department of Child Services et al
as 2:2015cv00431
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lozano, Jr. , BL , OL and others
Defendant:
Indiana Department of Child Services , Terrance K Ciboch , Kathryn Deardoff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Komoscar et al v. Pence et al
as 2:2015cv00256
Plaintiff:
Timothy J Komoscar and Kelly A Komoscar
Defendant:
Michael R Pence , Mary Beth Bonaventura , Indiana Department of Child Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
