Cases 1 - 10 of 57
WRIGHT v. WARDEN
as 2:2024cv00238
Petitioner:
ALEXANDER M. WRIGHT
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Alexander v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00235
Petitioner:
Justin Alexander and Justin Martin Alexander
Respondent:
Warden
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alexander v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00236
Petitioner:
Justin Alexander and Justin Martin Alexander
Respondent:
Warden
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alexander v. Warden
as 3:2023cv01060
Petitioner:
Michael Derrick Alexander and Michael D Alexander
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alexander v. Warden
as 3:2023cv00947
Petitioner:
Michael Derrick Alexander and Michael D Alexander
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alexander Wiley v. Jon Noble
as 23-2324
Petitioner / Appellant:
ALEXANDER J. WILEY
Respondent / Appellee:
JON NOBLE
Alexander v. Sheriff
as 3:2022cv00194
Petitioner:
Michael Derrick Alexander and Michael D Alexander
Respondent:
Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Widmann v. Unknown
as 4:2021cv04165
Petitioner:
Christian Alexander Widmann
Respondent:
Unknown
Interested Party:
Kevin Cmelik
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Wiley v. Noble
as 2:2021cv01037
Petitioner:
Alexander Jerome Wiley
Respondent:
Jon Noble
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Alexander v. Yandle et al
as 3:2021cv00903
Petitioner:
Ray L. Alexander and Jalil Solon Ali
Respondent:
Staci M. Yandle, U.S. Marshal's Service and Jeff Boulard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
