Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Lennie Perry v. Charles W. Mulaney, et al
as 24-1792
Petitioner:
LENNIE PERRY
Respondent:
CHARLES W. MULANEY, MICHELLE MARIE PETERSEN, JOHN DOE, U.S. Marshal and others
Perry v. Mulaney et al
as 1:2024cv02656
Petitioner:
Lennie Perry
Respondent:
Charles William Mulaney, Michelle Marie Petersen, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Johnson v. Landtrust et al
as 1:2023cv00415
Petitioner:
Jerome Johnson
Respondent:
Landtrust, John Doe, Jane Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vidal v. State of Wisconsin et al
as 2:2022cv01378
Petitioner:
Dennis Vidal
Respondent:
State of Wisconsin, Child Protection Services, Brenda Lee Barthoimew and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Johnson v. Landtrust et al
as 3:2022cv02371
Petitioner:
Jerome Johnson
Defendant:
Landtrust, John Doe, Jane Doe 1 and others
Respondent:
J. B. Pritzker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vidal v. State of Wisconsin et al
as 2:2022cv00872
Petitioner:
Dennis Vidal
Respondent:
State of Wisconsin, Child Protection Services, Brenda Lee Barthoimew and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Rodriguez-Calderon v. Drug Enforcement Administration et al
as 2:2022cv00458
Petitioner:
Juan Rodriguez-Calderon
Respondent:
Drug Enforcement Administration, John Doe and Milwaukee Police Drug Unit Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Simpson v. Doe, et. al.
as 3:2021cv50113
Respondent:
John Doe, et. al.
Petitioner:
Jeffrey E. Simpson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
JOHNSON v. DOE
as 4:2020cv00099
Respondent:
OFFICER #1 JOHN DOE
Petitioner:
THOMAS A JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
