Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Johnson v. Landtrust et al
as 1:2023cv00415
Petitioner:
Jerome Johnson
Respondent:
Landtrust, John Doe, Jane Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Landtrust et al
as 3:2022cv02371
Petitioner:
Jerome Johnson
Defendant:
Landtrust, John Doe, Jane Doe 1 and others
Respondent:
J. B. Pritzker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Slabon v. Wagner et al
as 1:2018cv05202
Respondent:
Chief Judge Tim Evans, Assistant State Attorney Jane Doe and Judge Wagner
Plaintiff:
Andrew Slabon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
RIGGLEMAN v. KRUEGER
as 2:2017cv00381
Respondent:
AND ANY JOHN OR JANE DOES, JEFF KRUEGER and MATTHEW TUSSEY
Petitioner:
ELISHA RIGGLEMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Santos v. Curran, Jr. et al
as 1:2017cv02761
Defendant:
Mark C Curran, Jr. and JANE DOE
Plaintiff:
Emil J Santos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Robinson, Jr. v. Sloop et al
as 3:2016cv01361
Petitioner:
James Robinson, Jr.
Respondent:
T Sloop, John/Jane Doe 1, John/Jane Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Tate, Sean v. Litscher, Jon et al
as 3:2016cv00826
Plaintiff:
Sean Tate
Defendant:
Jon Litscher , Randall Hepp, Chris Krueger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GREEN v. BUTTS
as 1:2016cv00607
Respondent:
KEITH BUTTS, JOHN/JANE DOE, BRUCE LEMMONS and others
Petitioner:
EVAN GREEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Griffin v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2015cv01530
Petitioner:
Gabriel Griffin
Respondent:
Wisconsin Department of Corrections , John Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Griffin v. Clarke et al
as 2:2015cv01475
Petitioner:
Peter Griffin
Respondent:
David A Clarke, Jr and John/Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
