Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Warren v. United States Government et al
as 2:2024cv00658
Petitioner:
James E Warren
Respondent:
United States Government and U.S. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Lennie Perry v. Charles W. Mulaney, et al
as 24-1792
Petitioner:
LENNIE PERRY
Respondent:
CHARLES W. MULANEY, MICHELLE MARIE PETERSEN, JOHN DOE, U.S. Marshal and others
Hurtado-Meza v. Downey et al
as 2:2023cv02106
Plaintiff:
Mario Hurtado-Meza
Defendant:
Michael Downey and U.S. Marshal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Alexander v. Yandle et al
as 3:2021cv00903
Petitioner:
Ray L. Alexander and Jalil Solon Ali
Respondent:
Staci M. Yandle, U.S. Marshal's Service and Jeff Boulard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bohn v. U.S. Marshals et al
as 3:2021cv00028
Petitioner:
Jonathan W. Bohn and Wade Bohn
Respondent:
FBOP and U.S. Marshals
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bell v. U.S. Marshall Service et al
as 1:2020cv00872
Respondent:
R.A. Heisner and U.S. Marshall Service
Petitioner:
Melvin T. Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Donelson v. US Dist. Court et al
as 1:2017cv06336
Petitioner:
Joseph Donelson
Respondent:
US Dist. Court , U.S. Attorney General and U.S. Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bell v. United States et al
as 1:2016cv05858
Petitioner:
Melvin T. Bell
Respondent:
United States, United States Attorney Office and U.S. Marshall Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Davis v. U.S. Marshals et al
as 1:2012cv01230
Petitioner:
Keyond Davis
Respondent:
U.S. Marshals and U.S. District Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HARRIS v. U.S. MARSHALS
as 1:2011cv01587
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER L. HARRIS
Respondent:
U.S. MARSHALS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
