Cases 51 - 60 of 508
Lopez v. Rogers
as 3:2020cv00039
Defendant:
Micheal Rogers
Plaintiff:
Rodolfo Antonio Lopez, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. Brookhart et al
as 3:2020cv00034
Defendant:
John R. Baldwin, Dr. Ritz, Wexford Health Sources, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Tony Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moffett, Walter v. Dittmann, Michael et al
as 3:2020cv00009
Defendant:
Cynthia Neuhauser, W. Rose, C. O'Donnell and others
Plaintiff:
Walter J.D. Moffett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Snowden v. Ehler et al
as 3:2019cv01319
Defendant:
John Doe, Jeremy Henning, Officer Draper and others
Plaintiff:
Donald V. Snowden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers Jr v. Protasiewicz et al
as 2:2019cv01852
Plaintiff:
Tony Rogers, Jr
Defendant:
Judge Janet Protasiewicz and Thomas E Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. Beloit Police Department et al
as 2:2019cv01542
Defendant:
Rock County District Attorneys Office, Rock County Jail, Rock County Sherrifs and others
Plaintiff:
D'Angelo Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. Correct Care Solutions et al
as 3:2019cv00656
Plaintiff:
Jamie R Green and Jamie Ray Green
Defendant:
Unknown Greivance Specialist, Bradley Rogers, Unknown Nurses and others
Not Yet Classified:
WABASH VALLEY E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frinkel v. United States
as 3:2019cv00573
Plaintiff:
Roger Frinkel, Jr
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cantu v. Department of Justice et al
as 3:2019cv00355
Plaintiff:
Antonio Cantu, Sr and Tony Cantu
Defendant:
Crawford, French, Singleton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH et al v. SAINT PAUL TRAVELERS COMPANY INC. et al
as 1:2019cv00598
Defendant:
BOB STELLER, MOBILE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT INC., EDDIE CURRAN and others
Plaintiff:
EDMOND HUDMOND SMITH, IV and LOUIS HOLGER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
