Cases 141 - 150 of 36,270
Barnes v. Cook County Jail/D.O.C. et al
as 1:2024cv04517
Plaintiff:
Maurice Barnes
Defendant:
Cook County Jail/D.O.C., Deputy Manzella, Response Team and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes v. De la Rosa et al
as 1:2024cv04519
Plaintiff:
Maurice Barnes
Defendant:
De la Rosa and Limpkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes v. Cook County Sheriff's Record Dept et al
as 1:2024cv04529
Plaintiff:
Maurice Barnes
Defendant:
Cook County Sheriff's Record Dept, H Sorte, Kiuilkes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LAMPE v. ALLEN et al
as 1:2024cv00908
Plaintiff:
DEVAN LAMPE
Defendant:
TRENT ALLEN and CHRISTINA REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ESTES v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00226
Plaintiff:
CODY ESTES
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, TRICIA PRETORIUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haslett v. Doe 1 et al
as 3:2024cv01403
Plaintiff:
Darryl Haslett
Defendant:
John Doe 1, Jane Doe 1 and John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gully v. Myers et al
as 3:2024cv01404
Plaintiff:
Brandon Gully
Defendant:
Percy Myers, Wexford Health Sources Inc and Jane Doe 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Galloway et al
as 3:2024cv01405
Plaintiff:
Mandela Jones
Defendant:
Darren Galloway, Jon Loftos and Latoya Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCOTT v. ALLEN et al
as 1:2024cv00897
Plaintiff:
EDDRELL SCOTT
Defendant:
ALLEN, CHRISTINA REAGLE and DENNIS REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Snow v. Grootens et al
as 3:2024cv03135
Plaintiff:
Justin Snow
Defendant:
Anthony Grootens, Brian Curran, Deana Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
