Cases 11 - 20 of 48
PRINTUP v. VANIHEL
as 2:2022cv00287
Plaintiff:
DARIUS PRINTUP
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRINTUP v. CENTURION HEALTH et al
as 2:2022cv00259
Plaintiff:
DARIUS PRINTUP
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH, LAUREN CUPP, SAMUEL BYRD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRINTUP v. IDOC et al
as 2:2022cv00235
Plaintiff:
DARIUS PRINTUP
Defendant:
IDOC, ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., FRANK VANIHEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRINTUP v. CENTURION HEALTH et al
as 2:2022cv00221
Plaintiff:
DARIUS PRINTUP
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH, LAUREN CUPP, SAMUEL BYRD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Director of B.O.P. et al
as 1:2022cv02459
Plaintiff:
Darius J. Murphy
Defendant:
Director of B.O.P., Warden of Metropolition Correctional Center, Lt. Joy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
PRINTUP v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2022cv00098
Plaintiff:
DARIUS PRINTUP
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, LEFFLER, GILBERT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Luther et al
as 2:2022cv00297
Plaintiff:
Darius D Banks, Sr
Defendant:
Eric Luther, Mental health staff and Melissa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRINTUP v. WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2022cv00003
Plaintiff:
DARIUS PRINTUP
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, ARAMARK CORR SERVICES LLC, DAVID BEDWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRINTUP v. HOLCOMB et al
as 2:2021cv00448
Plaintiff:
DARIUS PRINTUP
Defendant:
C. HOLCOMB, R. WHITE, MULLOTT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Estes v. Jackson County Jail et al
as 3:2021cv01014
Plaintiff:
Darius Estes
Defendant:
Jackson County Jail and Connie Faulkin Berry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
