Cases 21 - 30 of 69
DURHAM v. FAYETTE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2022cv00183
Plaintiff:
DEREK WAYNE DURHAM
Defendant:
FAYETTE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, DAVID LAUGHLIN and LEONARD BAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GADDIS v. LAUGHLIN et al
as 1:2022cv00041
Plaintiff:
DEREK RYAN GADDIS
Defendant:
JOEY LAUGHLIN, LEONARD BAKER, ZACK JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GODWIN v. GILBERT et al
as 2:2021cv00428
Plaintiff:
ROGER GODWIN
Defendant:
GILBERT, DUSTIN A. HOLMES, T.J. WATSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GODWIN v. HOLMES et al
as 2:2021cv00417
Plaintiff:
ROGER DALE GODWIN, ADEEB OMAR ASAMA LAIDEN and ADEEB OMAR OSAMA LAIDEN
Defendant:
DUSTIN A. HOLMES, T.J. WATSON, EDWARDS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
YEANAY v. BRANCHVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 3:2021cv00105
Plaintiff:
MARKUS SAYE YEANAY
Defendant:
BRANCHVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, LITTLEJOHN, C. WEICK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DURHAM v. FAYETTE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2021cv00552
Defendant:
FAYETTE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and LEONARD BAKER
Plaintiff:
DEREK DURHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BENNETT v. ZATECKY et al
as 1:2020cv03016
Defendant:
CHRISTINA CONYERS, DUSHAN ZATECKY, BROGAN and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW BENNETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GADDIS v. LAUGHLIN et al
as 1:2020cv02747
Defendant:
JOEY LAUGHLIN, ZACK JONES, JAKE LUNSFORD and others
Plaintiff:
DEREK RYAN GODDIS and DEREK RYAN GADDIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAKER v. SAVINO
as 1:2020cv02525
Defendant:
SAVINO
Plaintiff:
TAIWO BAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAUGHMAN v. BAKER et al
as 1:2020cv02154
Defendant:
JOHN DOES MEMBERS AND/OR EMPLOYEES OF THE HOWARD COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, OFFICER KENNETH WINES, OFFICER ADAM MARTIN and others
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF GUSTIN MARTIN and COURTNEY LAUGHMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
