Cases 31 - 40 of 1,895
Cornille v. Myers et al
as 3:2024cv01202
Defendant:
Administrative Review Board, William Loy, Percy Myers and others
Plaintiff:
Bradley J Cornille, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ballance v. Illinois Department of Correction et al
as 3:2024cv03100
Plaintiff:
Kevas Ballance
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Correction, J.B. Pritzker, Latoya Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivers v. Paulsen et al
as 2:2024cv00519
Plaintiff:
Denzel Samonta Rivers
Defendant:
Heather Paulsen, Steven Johnson, Bradley Everson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Doe #1 et al
as 2:2024cv00505
Plaintiff:
Dominic Williams
Defendant:
Jane Doe #1, Jane Doe #2 and Jane Doe #3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STONE v. EMERSON et al
as 2:2024cv00157
Plaintiff:
JEREMY STONE
Defendant:
DONALD EMERSON, SNODGRASS, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chandler-Martin v. Snell et al
as 3:2024cv03091
Plaintiff:
Reginald Chandler-Martin
Defendant:
. Snell, L Adams, Wexford Health Sources Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARSHALL v. WADAS et al
as 2:2024cv00140
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, J. WADAS, BOP and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN K. MARSHALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Travis Dickerson v. Milwaukee County, et al
as 24-1622
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS DICKERSON
Defendant:
MILWAUKEE COUNTY, C.O. JONES and JOHN DOE, or JANE DOE, Kitchen Supervisor
Travis Dickerson v. Milwaukee County, et al
as 24-1621
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS DICKERSON
Defendant:
MILWAUKEE COUNTY, C.O. JONES and JOHN DOE, or JANE DOE, Kitchen Supervisor
Delavega v. Cox et al
as 3:2024cv03087
Plaintiff:
Leonardo Delavega
Defendant:
Ashley Cox, Frank Catino, Kathy Ashcraft and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
