Cases 31 - 40 of 193
Smith v. Hain et al
as 1:2022cv06791
Plaintiff:
Anthony L Smith
Defendant:
Ron Hain, c/o Bowers, c/o Meza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROUZIER v. JAFFE et al
as 1:2022cv02302
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL ROUZIER
Defendant:
B. JAFFE, CORIZON, ALFA FINOTE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAUGH v. CENTURION HEALTH et al
as 2:2022cv00483
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM E. BAUGH
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH, BRIDGE WATERS, P. PEREZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2022cv00470
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, KEVIN GILMORE, THOMAS WELLINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KAPETANIOS v. CENTURION et al
as 2:2022cv00461
Plaintiff:
DONALD KAPETANIOS
Defendant:
CENTURION, PEREZ and ERIN SPRINKLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez v. Lister
as 3:2022cv02059
Plaintiff:
Orlando Perez
Defendant:
C/O Lister and Warden Monti
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COLLINS v. ZATECKY et al
as 2:2022cv00141
Plaintiff:
JOSHAWA S. COLLINS
Defendant:
DUSHAN ZATECKY, SMITH, BRANDON MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PASSMORE v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2022cv00092
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PASSMORE
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, M. RAINS, PHAGLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GOSSETT v. ZATECKY et al
as 2:2022cv00070
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY GOSSETT
Defendant:
ZATECKY and PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BERRY et al v. CARTER et al
as 1:2022cv00340
Plaintiff:
EARLIE B.A. BERRY, JR.
Defendant:
ROBERT E. CARTER, ARAMARK FOOD SERVICE, BRANDON PHERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
