Cases 71 - 80 of 112
LOGGING et al v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2014cv02037
Defendant:
KEVIN KIRKLEN, STANLEY KNIGHT and L.A. VAN NATTA
Plaintiff:
RANDY R. LOGGING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GIBSON v. KUMARAN et al
as 2:2014cv00287
Plaintiff:
JEREMY D. GIBSON
Defendant:
STANLEY KNIGHT and SASHI KUMARAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VANHORN et al v. LEMMON et al
as 2:2014cv00275
Defendant:
ALL MAILROOM EMPLOYEES, HARLEY CRABB, TROY KEITH and others
Plaintiff:
DARNELL CHIVERS and WILLIAM VANHORN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PENDER v. PECKHAM et al
as 1:2014cv01287
Defendant:
JAMES BASINGER, ED BUSS, LESLIE JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff:
SARAH JO PENDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BURTON v. KNIGHT
as 1:2014cv01263
Plaintiff:
GREGORY BURTON
Defendant:
STANLEY KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CARRUTHERS v. CORIZON MEDICAL STAFF et al
as 2:2014cv00217
Defendant:
CONNIE ALLEN, CORIZON INC., CORIZON MEDICAL STAFF and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CARRUTHERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. MITCHEFF et al
as 1:2014cv00836
Respondent:
GRACE BROWN, CORIZON HEALTH, AARON CUNNINGHAM and others
Petitioner:
ROBERT MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR v. KNIGHT et al
as 2:2014cv00140
Defendant:
C.O. MCWHIRTER, STANLEY KNIGHT, LIEUTENANT CADDELL and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TERRY v. PUTNAMVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2013cv00397
Defendant:
CONNIE ALLEN, BYER, CORIZON HEALTH CARE and others
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP TERRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STEPHENS v. KNIGHT
as 2:2013cv00220
Defendant:
STANLEY KNIGHT
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY DALE STEPHENS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
