Cases 1 - 10 of 413
Thompson v. Radtke et al
as 2:2024cv00507
Plaintiff:
David J Thompson
Defendant:
D Radtke, A DeGroot, Sgt Friedi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PEGAN v. ROY et al
as 4:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
VINCENT PEGAN
Defendant:
ROY, CASEY, FLOYD COUNTY JAIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHITE v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00249
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM A. WHITE
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, TRICIA PRETORIUS, CHRISTINA REAGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jeremy Blue v. Kirstie White, et al
as 24-1873
Plaintiff:
JEREMY BLUE
Defendant:
KIRSTIE WHITE, CARMEN SCHILLING, AMBER PLASTERER and others
White v. Warden, USP Thomson et al
as 3:2024cv50188
Plaintiff:
Kenneth White
Defendant:
Warden, USP Thomson and R. Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHITE v. NONE
as 3:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
TERRELL U. WHITE
Defendant:
NONE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. FORRESTAL et al
as 1:2024cv00788
Plaintiff:
JOHN ERIC THOMAS
Defendant:
KERRY J. FORRESTAL, PAIGE WHITE and GINA WHITE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PEGAN v. ROY et al
as 4:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
VINCENT PEGAN
Defendant:
ROY, CASEY, FLOYD COUNTY JAIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gant v. Will County Adult Detention Facility et al
as 1:2024cv02719
Plaintiff:
Armani D Gant
Defendant:
Will County Adult Detention Facility, J. Oliver, White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JAMES v. VANDERBURGH COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT.
as 3:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
SHAWN JAMES
Defendant:
VANDERBURGH COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT.
Interested Party:
SCOTT SIMMONS, THOMAS MOFFITT, MORGAN FOSTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
